[Active-l] Today's Cultural Warfare Update

R'ykandar Korra'ti kahvlist at murkworks.net
Sat Jul 14 12:12:38 PDT 2007


WorldNetDaily columnist Donald Hank calls GBLT rights "Big Sodomy,"  
in one of the weirdest anti-GBLT screeds ever, saying that "ex-gays"  
will "bring down" queers the same way that the health dangers of  
smoking brought down "Big Tobacco," and suggests a class-action  
lawsuit against GBLT rights groups. Reframing a debate has never been  
so stupid. Link courtesy elfs.livejournal.com;

WorldNetDaily condemns GLAAD for speaking out against the Fox News/ 
O'Reilly Report fake "story" alleging "hundreds" of lesbian gangs  
going around killing straight men; they note GLAAD's - correct -  
commentary that there was not one shred of evidence to support the  
story, then relies on former Concerned Women for America wonk Peter  
LaBarbera (now heading "Americans for Truth," an anti-gay  
organisation) as a "fact" source supporting the article. The "facts"  
mostly consist of assertions that queers are used to having it "their  
way" in the media, with no actual facts provided - only references  
back to the original stories that GLAAD pointed out were wrong,  
repeated as authoritative, "This isn't fraud! It says it's not!";

I'm... not sure what culture is in favour of _this_ crap, but: judge  
bars use of the terms "rape," "sexual assault," and all other terms  
implying force in a _rape trial_; the victim will now be required to  
describe being raped as "sexual intercourse" or "sex," which, of  
course, imply _permission_. I don't see any theocrats being for this  
- and WorldNetDaily is even on the right side, for once - but because  
of the huge "what the hell?!" nature of this, I'm including it; link  
courtesy kathrynt.livejournal.com;

American Family Association protests prompt three Operation Save  
America (formerly Operation Rescue) activists to disrupt the first  
Senate opening prayer by a Hindu religious figure; they condemn it as  
"an abomination";

On the off chance you think that Operation Save America/Operation  
Rescue might have any complaints about this, here's their press  
release condemning the arrest, calling the Senate "violated" by the  
"false god of Hinduism" and praising the protesters as having "the  
courage to stand and proclaim, 'Thou shalt have no other gods before  
me'";

There is video of the incident, of course, hosted on YouTube;

Amnesty International statement on their position on abortion;

Mr. Bush's Surgeon General nominee denies being anti-gay and  
disclaims his 'homosexuality as a pathology' paper, even admitting it  
had no scientific basis; I don't trust him; this courtesy Queerty, a  
blog with which I have no experience but which was linked to by  
Andrew Sullivan ( http://andrewsullivan.com );

Mike Gravel (Democratic presidential candidate) blasts Human Rights  
Campaign for not inviting him to their Democratic presidential  
candidate debate; he's the most vocally pro-GBLT of the candidates,  
according to many (including himself); HRC, however, wants Ms.  
Clinton to get the nomination. On the other hand, if you're wondering  
why the HRC has no Republican debate, it's because only one or two of  
the candidates even bothered answering their query letters, and even  
those were not willing to attend; the theoconservative base would  
destroy them for showing up with t3h qu33rz;

Time Magazine has a large article on "How the Democrats Got  
Religion." Yay, now everybody will be waving around their Jesus  
Penises; I can has new party nao plz?;

Box Turtle Bulletin is a three-person blog that monitors the same  
groups I do from an exclusive GBLT-issues related standpoint. They go  
into more depth within their focus; they don't provide quite as much  
original source, quoting from within articles rather than linking to  
articles in their entirety. That said, they're really good at what  
they do. Here are a few of their current articles:

	Bill O'Reilly broadcasts a Paul Cameron statistic, this one being  
the "lifespan" stat claiming that queers live two and a half decades  
less than straights; it's fraud, of course, like all of his work.  
This comes on the heels of the "Lesbian Gangs" story, which was also  
bullshit;

	BTB has a story on local-ministry "Ex-Gay" people, contrasting them  
to the national image presented by the large fundamentalist  
organisations;

	BTB's article, "Paul Cameron's World," ties famous fraud Paul  
Cameron's writings on GBLT people - he's the author of The Death  
Penalty for Homosexuality, amoungst other missives - with Paul  
Cameron's own disturbingly favourable writings about the Nazi party's  
handling of queers in Germany during the Third Reich. He also points  
out direct parallels between Cameron's writing and Nazi writing on  
other details of GBLT people. Yikes;

	BTB maintains a list of individuals and organisations citing Paul  
Cameron's work;

	BTB documents the dissemination - often by fraud - of Paul Cameron's  
latest "study," the fraudulent "lifespan" study mentioned above - and  
the one cited without challenge on The O'Reilly Factor;

Here's Paul Cameron again, just for old time's sake, on his own  
Family Research Institute web site; the article is "Stop Gay Rights,"  
condemning GBLT people being legal at all, as he does. He also blames  
"homosexuality" for the rise of Hitler in Germany - but will  
eventually go on (see above) to praise the Nazi regime's treatment of  
GBLT people. Yay;

Back on Mr. Bush's surgeon general nominee Dr. James Holsinger,  
Concerned Women for America calls questioning him about his anti-gay  
paper a "religious litmus test," saying that you can't oppose someone  
for public office for being anti-gay for that reason. (However, you  
can, obviously, support someone that way.) CWA's Matt Barber says  
that "Dr. Holsinger has objectively placed scientific substance over  
political correctness relative to the high-risk nature of homosexual  
behaviors," apparently just before Dr. Holsinger admitted that his  
paper had no scientific basis. They also praise Dr. Holsinger for  
describing GBLT people as "unnatural" and "unhealthy." "Essentially  
what these radical special interest groups and like-minded senators  
are saying is that Christians need not apply for public service. This  
is both hateful and discriminatory";

Focus on the Family: New Mexico Town Plans Tens Commandments Display,  
with help from the Alliance Defense Fund;

FotF displeased with Massachusetts governor for cutting "abstinence- 
only" sex ed. funding;

FotF has a quadruple-threat story about Plan B, the morning-after  
birth control pill; they falsely declare it, per usual, as a  
potential abortifacient; they note sales are expected to double next  
year; they declare it a health risk (via quoting the sockpuppet  
Family Research Council); _and_ proclaim it has "the potential for  
abuse." I wonder what that abuse would be? Birth control, perhaps;

Focus on the Family claims abstinence-based sex education is the  
cause of a 7% drop in self-reported sex by high school students;  
somehow this is retroactive back to 1991, but hey;

At the ground level, Focus on the Family would really rather prefer  
that women stayed in the home; this shows up a lot of ways. One of  
the ways that this shows up is that they regularly rerun a variation  
on the same story, "More Moms Say They'd Rather Be Home," saying that  
women would rather not have to work. Gosh. I wonder how many man  
would rather not have to work for a living, either? But that,  
somehow, never shows up, and there's a reason for that;

Focus on the Family promotes "assets not connected to morally  
questionable activities" run by Stewardship Partners Investment  
Counsel. It's kind of like a commercial, but it's pretending to be a  
news story. I wonder if they got paid for it;

Focus on the Family newsbrief notes Ohio state rep. Tom Brinkman  
(Brinkman? Brinkmanship? Irony is so ironic) introduces a  
comprehensive abortion ban bill, including "the distribution of  
abortion-inducing drugs"; what's interesting about _that_ is that as  
far as the fundamentalists are concerned, that includes emergency  
birth control (Plan B, which is _not_ the same as RU-486) and,  
according to some fundamentalists, _all_ forms of chemical birth  
control, and some which aren't. I wonder what definition is being  
used here;

Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM to support bans on "sexually explicit  
businesses," lists Troy, Michigan as an example, and! links to lawyer  
Scott Bergthold's web site where he offers services in helping draft  
such laws. Again, is this news, or a commercial? I don't know;

FotF condemns Florida library for accepting GBLT-themed collection  
that includes "pornographic" material. The collection will be  
restricted to adults only, but that's not good enough;

Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM to oppose adding GBLT people to  
Federal hate-crimes law, calling it, as they do, "special protections  
for homosexuals"; normally they use the phrase "special rights," so  
that's an interesting shift. I guess their polling has found that  
people respond more negatively to "special protections" for queers  
than "special rights";

Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM to complain to The Detroit Press that  
their coverage of an American Psychological Association committee's  
decision to consider whether it is possible to offer therapy -  
presumably "conversion" therapy :-p - to "patients who are  
dissatisfied living homosexually" is "bias, cut and dried" against ex- 
gay bullshit and for queers; according to the story below, it has  
mostly to do with considering religious beliefs of patients in  
therapy. In the article below, it's a theocon-based drive to get this  
considered;

Focus on the Family article on the American Psychological Association  
committee being formed; they worry that it will actually come out  
with a harder line against ex-gay bullshit;

FotF urges extension of abortion-only sexual education funding;

Focus on the Family's book promotion is for "Restoring Sexual  
Identity," an "ex-lesbian" book. One of Focus on the Family's core  
efforts is to separate the idea of sexual orientation from the  
person, to pretend that it's not integral but is instead an  
affliction that can be cured, that is separate from the person. This  
is core to all of Focus's "ex-gay" efforts, really;

FotF: "ACLU Challenges Arizona Tuition Tax-Credit Program";

FotF praises NFL coach Dungy (Indianapolis Colts) for being a  
fundamentalist; they've previously praised his anti-gay commentary;

Focus on the Family story, "University Sued for Refusing to Recognize  
Christian Group," points out another theoconservative meme; if they  
aren't allowed to discriminate against people (in this case, women  
and non-Christians), then they are being oppressed. In this case, the  
University of Florida is refusing to recognise a student group  
because it bans women and discriminates on the basis of religion,  
both explicitly, and as part of its charter. Focus on the Family  
calls this anti-Christian discrimination, a "disgrace," and is  
supporting the lawsuit (Christian Legal Society and Alliance Defense  
Fund lawsuit) against U. Florida;

Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM to "restore decency" on broadcast TV;  
it's a pair of amendments by Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS);

FotF story condemning "Homosexual Conference" on GBLT rights overseas  
quotes Peter LaBarbera supporting Jamaica's outright criminalisation  
of GBLT people. (Peter LaBarbera is a former Concerned Women for  
America wonk who is now with the anti-gay group "Americans for  
Truth.") FotF seems fine with this. Also, part of the condemnation  
includes blasting the conference for exporting "immoral American  
standards" to the rest of the world. I look forward to seeing Focus  
on the Family Canada, Focus on the Family Mexico, and Focus on the  
Family Latin and South America branches' commentary on this story;

FotF promotes their Washington Briefing theocon confab;

Focus on the Family unhappy that most Americans don't consider  
children the most important key to a successful marriage, and unhappy  
most Americans think marriage keys include "personal happiness and  
commitment";

Focus on the Family story on the Massachusetts man who failed the  
state bar exam in part because he refused to answer a question about  
same-sex marriage law in the state because he decided it was a  
violation of his religious beliefs. Focus on the Family is  
sympathetic. Note again the meme: anything that doesn't conform to  
their religious beliefs, be that antidiscrimination or standing law,  
must conform to them or be declared anti-Christian religious  
discrimination;

Focus on the Family commends Missouri banning Planned Parenthood from  
presenting information about sexual health in state public schools;

FotF: Kansas forms committee to review state abortion law; it's  
another attempt to Get Tiller, more or less;

Focus on the Family's Tom Minnery condemns Sen. Obama (Democratic  
presidential candidate) speech on Christian compassion.


----- 1 -----
Will ex-gays bring down 'Big Sodomy'?
Posted: July 7, 2007
By Donald Hank
WorldNetDaily

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56545

Remember how cool smoking was? If you're 45 or older, you do.

Whatever happened to that politically correct, cool, suave, debonair  
habit that was all the rage among college students, profs, teachers,  
Hollywood actors, big business and just about everyone purporting to  
have "intellect"?

In a nutshell, some scientists at the National Institutes of Health  
got together in the '60s, '70s and later and did some pioneering  
studies that proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that this cool habit  
could kill you.

Today, they're at it again. Only it isn't smoking. That's a dead  
issue, thanks to science and lawyers.

The activists then were Big Tobacco, supported by Hollywood, the  
advertising industry, the media and academe. Even politicians, like  
FDR, smoked and helped sell the image. But the activists were  
silenced by the nuclear option: lawsuits brought by the smokers, the  
victims themselves.

[...]

Of course, the promulgation of knowledge and data concerning the link  
between alternative sex and disease is hampered by the bullying  
tactics of the elite. Thus, only a few facts are known at all to some  
of the public (such as the results of a study in Scandinavia showing  
that men in same-sex marriages die 24 years earlier than their  
counterparts in the general population), and these facts aren't  
mainstream, thanks to the media blackout on this issue and the  
muzzling of opponents under color of law. [Editor's note: This is a  
lie. Specifically, a Paul Cameron lie. Amazing how he keeps getting  
recycled.] And that, in turn, is thanks to the activists.

[...]

If you have a friend or relative who has been persuaded by the media,  
big business, politicians, university programs, including courses of  
study, or any person or group to try this deadly lifestyle, and  
especially if your friend or relative is already suffering from a  
serious disease contracted as a result of it, talk to him or her at  
the first opportunity about the very real possibility of starting a  
class-action lawsuit against the group or groups that persuaded them  
to enter into the activity that did them in. If you happen to be in a  
care-giving profession, that is a shoe in the door.

[More at URL]


----- 2 -----
Payback for exposé on 'dyke' gang rapes
Homosexual activists attack revelations of lesbian assaults
Posted: July 9, 2007
By Bob Unruh
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56577

Two news stories about hundreds of lesbian gangs attacking and raping  
young girls in schools and other public locations have prompted a  
backlash against the reporters by members of the homosexual community.

The broadcasts by Memphis television station WPTY and Fox News host  
Bill O'Reilly quoted law enforcement authorities, victims, and even  
some gang members to document the growing number of attacks on young  
girls by lesbian gang members.

"The Eyewitness News Everywhere" report in Memphis documented  
incidents of gangs known as GTOs, or "Gays" Taking Over, attacking  
schoolgirls. Two prison inmates affiliated with the gang told the  
station they had begun meeting to offer each other support, but a  
younger generation of members had taken their group over for violence  
and rape.

[...]

Peter LaBarbera, of Americans for Truth, an organization publicizing  
information about the impact of the "gay" lifestyle, contends pro- 
homosexual influences have so permeated many media organizations that  
the "gay" promoters are accustomed to having only their side reported.

For example, the Memphis report referenced young schoolgirls being  
hurt, but GLAAD's statement ignored those victims.

"All they wanted to do was shut down the story," LaBarbera told WND.  
"This epitomizes the selfishness of the gay activists."

Having heard over the years of the fast-growing influence of lesbian  
gangs and their tactics of intimidation, LaBarbera said the reports,  
including an estimate of 150 attack squads in the Washington, D.C.,  
region alone, were no surprise.

[Ed. Note: this is fundamentaly wrong on almost every key level. For  
example, the "lesbians" in the DC case were men. DC police squads  
were asked by other parties and had no idea what the hell O'Reilly  
and others were going on about. And it gets worse from there.]

[...]

LaBarbera noted a prominent homosexual journalist has likened talking  
to Christians about "gay" issues to talking to the Klan about race  
issues.

"Obviously, this is their whole thing. They want to portray religious  
conservatives as analogous to the Klan," he said.

He noted even Fox News has contributed to the National Lesbian and  
Gay Journalists Association.

[...]

"Here's a lesbian gang story obviously affecting inner city schools.  
If there were any justice in the media this would be huge. There  
would be investigations kicking in," he said.

"This is really Orwellian. We've got gayspeak words," LaBarbera said.

"Here you have girls being raped by other girls, and somehow GLAAD  
manages to turn the homosexual lobby into the victims," he said.

The original Memphis TV report included stories of school washroom  
rapes of schoolgirls, assaults with sex toys, and the intimidation  
that comes from the threat of those attacks.

LaBarbera told WND he heard about the "lesbian bullying phenomenon"  
from former lesbian-turned-Christian evangelist Linda Jernigan, who  
was contacted by a teacher about speaking at a suburban Chicago where  
"this sick behavior was occurring."

[More at URL]


----- 3 -----
Words 'rape,' 'sexual assault' won't be allowed at rape trial
By The Associated Press
Hosted by First Amendment Center
06.22.07

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=18707

LINCOLN, Neb. — When Pamir Safi is tried for sexual assault next  
month, prosecutors and witnesses won't be allowed to use the terms  
"sexual assault" or "rape" to describe what happened.

That's because Lancaster County District Judge Jeffre Cheuvront  
agreed to bar those words after defense attorneys argued the point.  
Prosecutors don't think the ban is needed, but they say they'll live  
with it.

But the woman accusing Safi of assault, Tory Bowen, says the judge's  
order forces her to change the way she describes events. It's not  
clear whether the restrictions played any role in the hung jury that  
derailed the 33-year-old Safi's first trial in November.

[More at URL]


----- 4 -----
Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest
Associated Press
Friday, July 13, 2007; Page A07

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/12/ 
AR2007071202007.html

A Hindu clergyman made history yesterday by offering the Senate's  
morning prayer, but only after police officers removed three  
protesters from the visitors' gallery.

Rajan Zed, director of interfaith relations at a Hindu temple in  
Reno, Nev., gave the prayer that opens each day's Senate session. As  
he stood at the lectern in a bright orange and burgundy robe, two  
women and a man began shouting "this is an abomination" and other  
complaints from the gallery.

Police officers arrested them and charged them disrupting Congress, a  
misdemeanor. The male protester said "we are Christians and patriots"  
before police led them away. Police identified the protesters as Ante  
Nedlko Pavkovic, Katherine Lynn Pavkovic and Christan Renee Sugar.  
Their home towns were not available.

For several days, the Mississippi-based American Family Association  
has urged its members to object to the prayer because Zed would be  
"seeking the invocation of a non-monotheistic god."

[More at URL]


----- 5 -----
Theology Moved to the Senate and was Arrested
Theology has moved from the church house onto the floor of the United  
States Senate, and has been arrested.
Operation Save America Press Release
Contact: Dr. Pat McEwen, Operation Save America, 321-431- 3962

http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/575363635.html

WASHINGTON, July 12 /Christian Newswire/ -- Ante Pavkovic, Kathy  
Pavkovic, and Kristen Sugar were all arrested in the chambers of the  
United States Senate as that chamber was violated by a false Hindu  
god. The Senate was opened with a Hindu prayer placing the false god  
of Hinduism on a level playing field with the One True God, Jesus  
Christ. This would never have been allowed by our Founding Fathers.

"Not one Senator had the backbone to stand as our Founding Fathers  
stood. They stood on the Gospel of Jesus Christ! There were three in  
the audience with the courage to stand and proclaim, 'Thou shalt have  
no other gods before me.' They were immediately removed from the  
chambers, arrested, and are in jail now. God bless those who stand  
for Jesus as we know that He stands for them." Rev. Flip Benham,  
Director, Operation Save America/Operation Rescue

To Schedule Interviews with Rev. Benham:

Contact Pat McEwen: 321 431 3962


----- 6 -----
Christian extremists disrupt Hindu Senate invocation
C-Span 2
Hosted on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9To30Hz7A

[Click for unedited video]


----- 7 -----
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA
July 6, 2007

http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=ENGUSA20070706001

Most Reverend William S. Skylstad
Bishop of Spokane
President
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
3211 Fourth St. NE
Washington, DC 20017

Dear Bishop Skylstad:

I am writing in response to the July 2 statement from the U.S.  
Catholic Bishops on Amnesty International's (AI's) sexual and  
reproductive rights policy and its specific attention to aspects of  
abortion.

First, I believe strongly that we should not allow divergent views on  
any one issue to undermine our shared commitment to work together to  
end human suffering around the world. Through the years and despite  
differences of perspective, the Catholic church and Amnesty, though a  
secular organization, have stood as allies on fundamental questions  
of human dignity, especially in our shared opposition to the death  
penalty and our joint work to free prisoners of conscience jailed for  
their religious beliefs. We have accomplished a great deal together.  
It remains my fervent hope that we will continue to act upon our  
common devotion to these causes by working jointly on behalf of  
victims of abuse and torture, even though we cannot expect to agree  
on each and every issue.

In this spirit I wish to correct the misunderstanding conveyed in the  
bishops' statement which incorrectly asserted that AI has adopted a  
"pro-abortion stand." In fact, Amnesty International's policy on  
sexual and reproductive rights seeks to ensure that women and men can  
exercise their sexual and reproductive rights free from coercion,  
discrimination and violence. In doing so it responds to the human  
suffering caused by abuses of these rights. Defending the right of  
women to sexual and reproductive integrity in the face of grave human  
rights violations, AI does not promote abortion as a universal right  
but recognizes instead the right of women to be free of fear, threat  
and coercion as they manage the consequences of rape and other grave  
human rights violations.

AI will not advocate "abortion on demand," nor do we counsel  
individuals as to what choice they should make on abortion. We take  
no position as to whether abortion is right or wrong, nor on its  
legalization generally. Instead our position is focused on three  
areas of concern: opposition to imprisonment or other criminal  
sanctions for women or providers of abortion; support for medical  
treatment for women who suffer complications from unsafe abortions,  
and within reasonable gestational limits, support for women who seek  
abortion in cases of rape, incest or to preserve her life or when  
pregnancy poses a grave risk to her health.

[More at URL]


----- 8 -----
Holsinger Says He Ain't Anti-Gay
Queerty
Online as of 13 July 2007

http://www.queerty.com/news/holsinger-says-he-aint-anti-gay-20070712/

Senator Ted Kennedy dug into Surgeon General Dr. James Holsinger  
during today’s Senate hearing. The senator from Massachusetts  
eschewed questions on obesity and tobacco, two of Holsinger’s medical  
missions, and instead asked the Kentucky based doctor about that now  
infamous anti-gay, United Methodist Church-backed paper,  
“Pathophysiology of Male Homosexuality”:

[...]

The bearded physician told the Senate:

Since my nomination on May 24, there have been several statements  
made about me. Questions have been raised about my faith and about my  
commitment to ensuring the health and welfare of all Americans,  
including gay and lesbian Americans.

I am deeply troubled by these claims, which do not reflect who I am,  
what I believe or the work I have accomplished in over 40 years of  
practicing medicine. … Let me be clear — I have a profound respect  
for the essential human dignity of all people regardless of  
background or sexual orientation.

[...]

Meanwhile, presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and  
Chris Dodd, all of whom have questioned Holsinger’s medical merits,  
failed to show up to the hearing. They will, however, be appearing at  
HRC’s gay debate.


----- 9 -----
Gravel Blasts HRC
Queerty
12 June 2007

http://www.queerty.com/news/gravel-blasts-hrc-20070712/

Mike Gravel may not be a front runner for the democratic presidential  
nomination, but he’s sure as hell the most outspoken of the  
candidates. Could it be his opinionated ways that led HRC to snub him  
for their gay debates?

Gravel certainly thinks so:

"…I think the real reason why HRC didn’t invite me is that I’m too  
vocal in my advocacy of gay rights. None of the top tier candidates  
would have been comfortable facing an opponent who consistently  
points out their refusal to embrace true equality for gays and  
lesbians. HRC simply bowed to the star factor. It’s just a shame that  
this travesty was perpetrated in the name of the LGBT community."

[More at URL]


----- 10 -----
How the Democrats Got Religion
Thursday, Jul. 12, 2007
Time Magazine
By NANCY GIBBS AND MICHAEL DUFFY

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1642649-1,00.html

A president has to be a preacher of sorts, instructing, consoling,  
summoning citizens to sacrifice for some common good. But candidates  
are competitors, which means they seldom manage to talk about faith  
in a way that doesn't disturb people, doesn't divide them, doesn't  
nail campaign posters on the gates of heaven. Republicans have been  
charged with exploiting religious voters, Democrats with ignoring  
them: Hillary Clinton's voice gets tight as she recalls the mocking  
response she received when she first spoke in spiritual terms about  
the longing that people felt to invest in causes larger than self- 
interest. "I talked about my faith years ago and was pilloried for  
it," she says, and it is hard to tell if she is more impatient with  
the conservatives who presumed they held the patent on piety or with  
the liberals whose worship of diversity all but excluded the devout.

[...]

In this campaign season, if Clinton and Barack Obama and John Edwards  
are any measure, there will be nothing unusual in Democrats' talking  
about the God who guides them and the beliefs that sustain them.  
Clinton has hired Burns Strider, a congressional staffer (and  
evangelical Baptist from Mississippi) who is assembling a faith  
steering group from major denominations and sends out a weekly wrap- 
up, Faith, Family and Values. Edwards has been organizing conference  
calls with progressive religious leaders and is about to embark on a  
12-city poverty tour. In the past month alone, Obama's campaign has  
run six faith forums in New Hampshire, where local clergy and  
laypeople discuss religious engagement in politics. "We talk about  
ways people of faith have gone wrong in the past, what they have done  
right and where they see it going in the future," says his faith- 
outreach adviser, Joshua DuBois. Speeches on everything from the  
budget to immigration to stem-cell research are carefully marinated  
in Scripture. "Science is a gift of God to all of us," said House  
Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a debate on increased embryo-research  
funding, "and science has taken us to a place that is biblical in its  
power to cure."

The Democrats are so fired up, you could call them the new Moral  
Majority. This time, however, the emphasis is as much on the majority  
as on the morality as they try to frame a message in terms of broadly  
shared values that don't alarm members of minority religions or  
secular voters. It has become an article of faith among party leaders  
that it was sheer strategic stupidity to cede the values debate to  
Republicans for so long; that most people want to reduce abortion but  
not criminalize it, protect the earth instead of the auto industry,  
raise up the least among us; and that a lot of voters care as much  
about the candidates' principles as about their policies. "What we're  
seeing," says strategist Mike McCurry, "is a Great Awakening in the  
Democratic Party."

[More at URL]


----- 11 -----
Bill O’Reilly Broadcasts Cameron’s “Lifespan” Statistic Unchallenged
Jim Burroway
Box Turtle Bulletin
July 12th, 2007

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/07/12/544

A few weeks ago, Bill O’Reilly’s program became something of a  
laughingstock for raising the specter of 150 lesbian gangs wreaking  
havoc in Washington, D.C. O’Reilly’s guest, Rod Wheeler, who gave  
that scenario, has since apologized and O’Reilly has had to eat crow  
over it.

Just last night, O’Reilly’s program became a platform for another  
bogus statistic, this one from discredited “researcher” Paul Cameron,  
whose comparison of homosexuality to smoking made it on the air  
without challenge.

The segment on O’Reilly’s program focused on the San Diego Padres’  
decision to hold a Gay Pride Night while giving away hats to  
children. Sandy Rios, formerly of the Concerned Women for America and  
currently of the Culture Campaign, took the anti-gay side. Ron  
Deharte of San Diego Pride defended the Padres’ decision. During the  
three-way interview, the screen showed numerous scenes of gay  
couples, some holding hands, hugging and kissing. O’Reilly exploded  
near the end of the segment, calling those scenes “exhibitionistic.”  
This was clearly the case of two against one, with the calm-spoken  
Deharte trying to make his points between the shouting.

Sandy Rios complained about the “mixing” of children with gay  
couples, saying it sent the wrong message:

Sandy Rios: But let me just give you another way to think about this.  
What if the San Diego Padres decided to celebrate a “smoking is fun”  
night, and they had a smoking men’s chorus performing. Now there are  
a lot of people that come to the game and they have a pack of  
cigarettes or whatever, maybe they can’t smoke there. But that’s  
different than celebrating smoking because we all know is that  
smoking is really harmful to your health. Well, what people don’t  
understand is that the homosexual lifestyle, especially for men, is  
deadly. It takes their life ten to twenty years earlier than straight  
men. That is not what we should be promoting before of our children…  
[Emphasis mine]

Bill O’Reilly: But that’s their decision…

The connection of homosexuality to the dangers of smoking and a  
reduced lifespan comes directly from discredited researcher Paul  
Cameron. He first claimed that gay men die at the average age of 42  
and lesbians die at 44 in 1993. That claim, based on his “obituary  
study,” has been roundly discredited.

[More at URL]


----- 12 -----
Contrasting National Ex-Gay Hype with Local Ministries
Timothy Kincaid
Box Turtle Bulletin
July 11th, 2007

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/07/11/542

For years we’ve heard tales of “former homosexuals just like me”  
touted by national spokesmen with a sincere delivery, a confident  
smile, and a wife and children hovering just within view of the  
cameras. That is the public face of the ex-gay movement, the one  
presented when politicians seek justification for denying civil  
equality to gay individuals or couples.

The Miami New Times featured a story today on their local ex-gay  
ministry, Worthy Creations. Those familiar with the movement will not  
read much new; it covers the history of the movement and its many  
embarrassments along with its wishes, dreams, and claims. But these  
stories that sporadically appear around the nation which highlight  
local ministries give a flavor that seems miles from the slick image  
that Exodus’ national office sells.

Although Exodus’ Randy Thomas claims an informal study in 2003  
resulted in 11,000 weekly attendants at their 150 ministries (an  
average of 73), at the meeting attended by the reporter, there were  
only six strugglers – a number far more consistent with what we read  
in other local reports. And unlike the happily married ex-gays that  
show up to press conferences and White House events, the local ex-gay  
seems to be more like those described in this article:

[More at URL]


----- 13 -----
Paul Cameron’s World
The SPLC said in 2005 that Cameron’s theories on homosexuality  
“echoes Nazi Germany.” They didn’t know the half of it. Cameron  
himself turned to a notorious concentration camp commandant to  
validate this theories.
Jim Burroway
May 14, 2007; revised May 22, 2007
The original version is available at Ex-Gay Watch
Box Turtle Bulletin

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/07/11/542

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center described Paul Cameron’s  
theories on homosexuality this way: “Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi  
Germany in that these disparaging descriptions of homosexuals are  
reminiscent of themes found in the ugly history of anti-Semitism…”.  
But as we shall see, Cameron does much more than just echo Nazi  
Germany in his theories on homosexuality. And the SPLC didn’s have to  
compare his theories to anti-Semitism to hear those echos. It turns  
out that Cameron himself is much more direct, employing a bit of  
holocaust revisionism to advance his cause. And the surprising thing  
is, this evidence has been right there all along on his web site,  
largely unnoticed for eight years.

But before we examine his retelling of the gay experience in Nazi  
Germany, let's take a few moments to explore a little bit about what  
goes on in Cameron’s world. And let’s begin with a recent e-mail  
exchange between Paul Cameron and Dr. Warren Throckmorton, associate  
professor of Psychology at Grove City College in northwestern  
Pennsylvania.

[More at URL]


----- 14 -----
Paul Cameron’s Collaborators
These are just some of the people who provide oxygen for Paul  
Cameron’s self-documented Nazi-revisionist mission. Do they agree  
with Cameron’s “solutions”?
Jim Burroway
May 15, 2007, Revised May 18, 2007.

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/07/11/542

The Southern Poverty Law Center in 2005 made a passing reference to  
Paul Cameron’s theories “echoing Nazi Germany.” Unfortunately they  
missed the real story. In a chilling 1999 newsletter, Paul Cameron  
himself cited the mercurial observations of a notorious Nazi  
concentration camp commandant as evidence supporting his own theories  
on homosexuality. Those observations, in turn, provide a deeply  
disturbing context to Cameron’s obsession for those who — to use a  
phrase Cameron borrows from Rudolph Höss — live “parasitic lives.”  
And in his web site, he makes it plainly clear that it is his quest  
to bring his vision to fruition for the rest of us.

Paul Cameron is just one man. But when others associate themselves  
with his junk science to further their agenda, they provide him with  
the oxygen he needs to keep his quest alive. Otherwise, he would fade  
in irrelevance. And so the question must be asked of everyone who  
uses his “research”: Do you agree with Paul Cameron’s “Solutions”?

[More at URL]


----- 15 -----
Paul Cameron's Footprint
And Another Stab At The “Homosexual Lifespan”
Jim Burroway
April 9, 2007

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,018.htm

Another “homosexual lifespan" study has hit the news. According to a  
flurry of press releases making rounds, married gays in Scandinavia  
die 24 years younger than everyone else:

Married Gays Die 24 Years Younger
Researchers Paul and Kirk Cameron reported at the Eastern  
Psychological Association convention that married gays and lesbians  
lived about 24 fewer years than their married heterosexual  
counterparts.1

Gays Die Sooner: Implications for Adoption
“The life span of gays is 20-plus years shorter than the life span of  
heterosexuals,” states Dr. Paul Cameron of the Family Research  
Institute, a Colorado-based think tank. “This shortened lifespan,” he  
warned, “has profound implications for adoption.”2

Discrimination Doesn’t Drive Gays To An Early Grave
Dr. Paul Cameron, of the Family Research Institute, a Colorado-based  
think tank, said “there was essentially no difference between the  
average age of death for homosexuals in accepting societies — Norway  
and Denmark — and the United States, which, according to gay rights  
activists, is still ‘a homophobic society’ since it still bans them  
from the military and giving blood.”3

Homosexuality More Dangerous Than Smoking
Studies have shown that years of smoking shortens the lifespan of the  
smoker from 1 to 7 years. But analysis of the age of death in Norway  
and Denmark for gays who are legally married suggests that engaging  
in homosexual behavior reduces the lifespan by 24 years!4

[More at URL]


----- 16 -----
Can Anything Be Done to Stop Gay Rights?	
Paul Cameron
Family Research Institute
Online as of 14 July 2007

http://www.familyresearchinst.org/Default.aspx?tabid=145

The West has produced the richest and most vital civilization ever to  
grace the planet, but our civilization is dying by slow degrees.  
Western nations are producing too few children to maintain their  
population. Most of our demographic decline is due to a mix of a self- 
centered reluctance to have children, birth control, wholesale  
abortion, and women in the workplace. The rise of militant  
homosexuality has also been a significant factor. It is both a  
symptom and a cause of our decline.

On one hand, the growing acceptance of homosexuality is symptomatic  
of a larger trend in Western society — the growing view of sexuality  
as “mere recreation,” a casual activity divorced from procreation and  
family. Gay rights is also a cause of civilization’s decline.  
Homosexuality is a unique manifestation of hedonism. Instead of  
producing children, it preys on them. Instead of keeping to itself,  
it proselytizes. Instead of promoting health and stability (as does  
marriage), it thrives on aggression, spreads disease, and destroys  
its practitioners, emotionally and physically.

Along with the promotion of birth control and abortion, the present  
bland acceptance of homosexuality signals the end of the religious  
and moral vision that made Western civilization coherent and  
functional. We had a forewarning of this social collapse in Germany  
following that nation’s defeat in World War I. During the Weimar  
Republic, homosexuality was acceptable and consequently rampant. The  
popular culture celebrated perversity. Kurt Weill’s songs portrayed  
pleasure-seeking men moving from one homosexual encounter to another.  
The first gay rights film, “Different From The Others,” appeared in  
Germany in 1919. This period of moral chaos spawned National  
Socialism and the rise to power of its sexually twisted leader,  
Adolph Hitler.

[More at URL]


----- 17 -----
Poisoning the Surgeon General Nominee
Concerned Women for America
7/12/2007

http://www.cwfa.org/articles/13424/MEDIA/misc/index.htm

Washington, D.C. – This morning Senate hearings will begin for Dr.  
James Holsinger, President Bush’s nominee for Surgeon General.  
Holsinger’s nomination has become unfairly politicized due to both  
his medical findings on homosexual behavior and his religious  
beliefs. While Concerned Women for America (CWA) takes no position on  
his nomination, we do believe that it is inappropriate and  
unconstitutional to subject Dr. Holsinger to a religious litmus test.

Holsinger’s findings on male homosexual behaviors are medically sound  
and are supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  
(CDC). He has unapologetically stated that homosexual behavior is  
“unnatural” and “unhealthy” and runs counter to natural human  
biological design.

Matt Barber, CWA’s Policy Director for Cultural Issues, said, "It is  
both inappropriate and unconstitutional for the Senate to require  
that any nominee pass an anti-Christian religious litmus test based  
upon the demands of extremist left-wing special interest groups. In  
the past, Dr. Holsinger has objectively placed scientific substance  
over political correctness relative to the high-risk nature of  
homosexual behaviors. The determinations he and numerous other  
medical experts have reached are completely in line with the findings  
of the CDC. The CDC has documented that people who engage in  
homosexual behavior - by far - are at highest risk for devastating  
and often deadly sexually transmitted diseases. Will liberals now  
call for the CDC to be shut-down because the medical facts undermine  
their political agenda? Essentially what these radical special  
interest groups and like-minded senators are saying is that  
Christians need not apply for public service. This is both hateful  
and discriminatory."

For Information Contact:
Jennifer Fedor
(202) 488-7000
media.cwfa.org


----- 18 -----
New Mexico Town Plans Ten Commandments Display
Focus on the Family
7-13-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005047.cfm

The Bloomfield, N.M., City Council is moving forward with plans for a  
granite monument displaying the Ten Commandments outside City Hall,  
according to reports from The Associated Press.

The council approved a policy this week that allows monuments on city  
property that relate to the development of the law and government of  
the city, state or nation. The policy was drawn up with help from the  
Alliance Defense Fund.

[More at URL]


----- 19 -----
Massachusetts Governor Cuts Abstinence-Education Funding
Focus on the Family
7-13-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005048.cfm

On Thursday, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick vetoed $41 million in  
spending approved by the Legislature, including funding for an  
abstinence-only education program, The Boston Globe reports.

Among the cuts, Patrick excised a provision that would have allowed  
the state to spend $712,000 in federal money on abstinence ed.  
Massachusetts has received the grant since 1998, but public health  
officials in the administration decided they no longer want the  
money, because it can't be used to teach birth control.

[More at URL]


----- 20 -----
Sales of Morning-After Pill May Double in a Year
Focus on the Family
7-13-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005049.cfm

In August 2006, the Food and Drug Administration authorized the sale  
of the morning-after pill without a prescription to women 18 and  
older. Annual sales of Plan B are expected to double this year, The  
Washington Post reports.

"This is very concerning," Charmaine Yoest of the Family Research  
Council told The Post. FRC is among several groups suing the FDA to  
reverse the decision. "We think this is putting women's health at risk."

Plan B consists of higher doses of the hormones found in standard  
birth control pills. It is taken within 72 hours of sex and is  
intended to prevent pregnancy, but can sometimes cause an early  
abortion.

Dawn Vargo, associate bioethics analyst for Focus on the Family  
Action, said: "The increased use of Plan B increases the risk to  
women's health and has the potential for abuse."


----- 21 -----
Report Shows Lower Teen-Sex and Pregnancy Rates
Decline began with the introduction of abstinence education.
by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor
Focus on the Family
07-13-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000005052.cfm

Teen-sex and pregnancy rates are down, according to a National Center  
for Health Statistics (NCHS) report released today. Experts say  
parents should take a closer look at the data to determine what the  
statistics show and how to keep kids healthy.

The NCHS study tracked trends among high school students from 1991 to  
2005. In 1991, 54 percent of teens reported having had sexual  
intercourse. In 2005, that number dropped to 47 percent. The rate of  
teen pregnancy also showed a dramatic decline.

[...]

Linda Klepacki, analyst for sexual health at Focus on the Family  
Action, said 1991 is a significant marker for a reason.

"That's when we separated out abstinence education from contraceptive- 
based education," she said. "We have seen a continual decline since  
1991, so we can infer that we've had an effect with abstinence  
education in our public schools."

Abma said Klepacki is on to something. While the study did not  
attempt to investigate cause, she said, efforts to educate teens  
about the risks associated with sexual intercourse have "increased  
and intensified" over the last decade.

"Given how many of those efforts are going on," Abma said, "it is  
probably making an impact on both abstinence and responsible sexual  
behavior."

[More at URL]


----- 22 -----
More Moms Say They'd Rather Be Home
Juggling work and family is tough to pull of.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
7-13-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000005050.cfm

More and more working moms say full time is not ideal; they’d rather  
be at home with their kids. What’s more, 48 percent of stay-at-home  
moms say they wouldn’t change a thing, according to the Pew Research  
Center.

Colorado working mom Joanna Brown told Family News in Focus that  
finances make it necessary for her to work, but it would not be her  
first choice.

[More at URL]


----- 23 -----
Investors Search for Returns Without Regrets
'Values investments' consider morality as well as profits.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
7-12-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000005041.cfm

"Values investments" – assets not connected to morally questionable  
activities – are getting some conscientious investors a good return  
on their dollar.

Investing based on moral values is proving to many to be the ticket  
to good returns and a clean conscience. Rusty Leonard runs  
Stewardship Partners Investment Counsel, which has outperformed the  
S&P 500 by better than 26 percent.

[...]

The Timothy Plan offers a variety of mutual funds for people who  
oppose abortion, pornography, alcohol, tobacco and gambling.  
President Stephen Ally says although that limits quite a few  
successful companies, they've doing pretty well for their investors.  
One fund contains companies such as Bed, Bath and Beyond and Colgate  
Palmolive.

[More at URL]


----- 24 -----
Ohio Lawmakers Consider Abortion Ban
Focus on the Family
7-12-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005040.cfm

Ohio state Rep. Tom Brinkman introduced legislation Tuesday to outlaw  
all abortion, including the distribution of abortion-inducing drugs,  
The Cincinnati Enquirer reported.

[...]

Gov. Ted Strickland has promised to veto any bill that restricts  
abortion.

[More at URL]


----- 25 -----
Michigan City Restricts Sexually Oriented Businesses
Focus on the Family
7-12-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005039.cfm

Sexually explicit businesses, including strip clubs, book stores and  
video stores, now face strict licensing requirements, thanks to a  
vote by the Troy City Council. Troy is a suburb of Detroit.

According to the city's Web site, owners of these businesses must  
pass a criminal background check, provide a list of their employees,  
refrain from serving alcohol and install tip boxes.

The restrictions are meant as a deterrent, since Troy does not have  
any sexually oriented adult establishments.

Daniel Weiss, senior analyst for media and sexuality at Focus on the  
Family Action, said Troy is right in taking pre-emptive action.

"Even if no sexually oriented business exists in a town, it is  
crucial to set up these ordinances as soon as possible," he said.  
"We've seen these sex businesses intentionally locate in communities  
with no regulations in place. Once they're there, it's very hard to  
get rid of them. It's much better to proactively protect your  
community."
TAKE ACTION
Scott Bergthold, one of the nation's foremost experts in obscenity  
laws, can help your town draft an ordinance to regulate sexually  
oriented businesses.

(NOTE: Referral to Web sites not produced by Focus on the Family is  
for informational purposes only and does not necessarily constitute  
an endorsement of the sites' content.)


----- 26 -----
Florida City Officials Allow Graphic Homosexual Material in Public  
Library
Focus on the Family
7-12-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005038.cfm

Despite objections from Fort Lauderdale Mayor Jim Naugle, the City  
Commission voted to allow a collection of books and magazines  
depicting hard-core, homosexually oriented pornographic material to  
be placed in the city's public library, LifeSiteNews reported.

The Stonewall gay and lesbian book archive will be moved from the Gay  
and Lesbian Community Center to the county-run ArtSpace library.
Jack Rutland, executive director of the Stonewall Library and  
Archive, said his policy is that only people 18 and older can use the  
library, because of the graphic nature of the material depicting  
homosexual sex.

[More at URL]


----- 27 -----
U.S. Senate Prepares to Vote on Dangerous Hate-Crimes Bill
Vote could come Monday on amendment to create special protections for  
homosexuals.
by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor
Focus on the Family
7-12-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000005043.cfm

Legislation to create a new category of crime for actions said to be  
motivated by prejudice based on specific characteristics, including  
“sexual orientation” and “gender identity,” could get a vote in the  
U.S. Senate as soon as Monday.

Democrats have attached an amendment to a Defense spending bill that  
would create federally protected “class status” for homosexuals,  
bisexuals, transvestites, “transgender” and “transsexual” people.

"You’re essentially creating a civil right based on immoral and  
changeable behavior, and that’s a bad precedent to set in the law,"  
said Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth.

The House of Representatives passed an identical version of the  
legislation May 3 by a vote of 237 to 180.

On Monday, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council will join  
Focus on the Family's Dr. Bill Maier and Tom Minnery to discuss hate  
crimes on the Focus on the Family radio broadcast.
"This legislation is essentially a federal power grab," said Matt  
Barber, policy director for cultural issues at Concerned Women for  
America. "It circumvents the 10th Amendment, which guarantees states'  
rights, and the authority of state police power, and gives the  
federal government power to police and to govern and to monitor and  
to enforce crime at a municipal, or local level, which is really  
constitutionally dubious."

Ashley Horne, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action,  
said Democrats are using a political tactic by tacking hate-crimes  
legislation onto Defense spending.

"The president has already indicated he would veto a hate-crimes  
bill," she said. "They’ve inserted this bill as an amendment to the  
Defense Authorization Bill, and that puts the president in a  
difficult position."

Horne and Barber are encouraging pro-family Americans to get involved.

"People should call the Senate," Barber said, "and let their senators  
know that this hate-crimes legislation is dangerous, that it can have  
a slippery slope effect, and really can oppress freedom of religion  
and freedom of speech. It's entirely unnecessary because the  
Constitution and 14th Amendment guarantee equal protection under the  
law."

TAKE ACTION
Urge your senators to oppose the hate-crimes amendment. If you are a  
CitizenLink subscriber, click the blue "Hate Crimes" button in the e- 
mail. Otherwise, click on this link.


----- 28 -----
Bias, Cut and Dried
Need proof that the mainstream news media lean to the left? Keep  
reading.
by Gary Schneeberger, vice president, media relations
Focus on the Family
7-12-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/clcommentary/A000005044.cfm

It’s one of the most blatant examples of media bias I’ve ever seen –  
and I’ve seen a lot of them.

It appeared in Wednesday’s Detroit Free Press, under the headline  
“Therapy to change gays’ orientation to be reviewed,” and was written  
– sort of – by Associated Press reporter David Crary. I say he sort- 
of wrote it because the Free Press ran only a portion of his piece –  
about how hundreds of psychological, educational and ministry groups  
are questioning the objectivity of an American Psychological  
Association (APA) committee considering whether it’s ethical to offer  
therapy to patients who are dissatisfied living homosexually.

[...]

Whoever edited the story there went beyond excising a few paragraphs  
toward the bottom; instead, he or she removed the comments of every  
one of the four people who expressed socially conservative views. The  
only sources directly quoted are two people on the other side of the  
debate – one of whom gets his quote from the story repeated in larger  
type (known in the news business as a “read-out” or “pull-quote”).

[...]

Fair enough – but I wouldn’t say far enough. It’s true that a  
skeletal summary of our side’s view is included, and there is a  
snippet from the letter Focus on the Family signed, but we were  
robbed of our opportunity to speak directly to readers. Not once, but  
four times. With all due respect to Mr. Andrews, it’s not about how  
many lines or words each side got to make its points; it’s about why  
his newspaper thought spokespeople on our side didn’t deserve to make  
their points at all.

[Editor's note: "robbed." Nice.]

[More at URL]


----- 29 -----
Psychologists to Review Policy on Homosexuality
Focus on the Family, others urge APA to consider faith of patients.
by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor
Focus on the Family
7-11-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000005032.cfm

Beginning next week, a task force set up by the American  
Psychological Association (APA) will begin reviewing the  
organization's 10-year-old policy on homosexuality, which opposes  
counseling that treats same-sex attraction as a mental illness, but  
does not forbid various therapies that address unwanted same-sex  
attraction.

Focus on the Family has joined more than 250 pro-family organizations  
and individuals in urging the APA to recognize the religious beliefs  
of clients and to allow those who struggle with unwanted same-sex  
attraction to receive therapy. The letter is signed by the Southern  
Baptist Convention, Assemblies of God, Church of the Nazarene, the  
American Association of Christian Counselors, the National Board of  
Christian Clinical Therapists and more than 22 higher-education  
institutions.

"We believe that psychologists should assist clients to develop lives  
that they value, even if that means they decline to identify as  
homosexual," said the letter, which represents about 20 million  
Americans. It requests a meeting with APA leaders.

Warren Throckmorton, a psychology professor at Grove City College  
near Pittsburgh, was denied a seat on the task force.

[Editor's note: Warren Throckmorton is a former regular writer for  
Concerned Women for America, but has not been seen on their website  
lately, possibly because, to his credit, he doesn't like Paul  
Cameron's degree of fraud.]


----- 30 -----
Psychologists to Review Policy on Homosexuality
Focus on the Family, others urge APA to consider faith of patients.
by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor
Focus on the Family
7-11-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000005032.cfm

Beginning next week, a task force set up by the American  
Psychological Association (APA) will begin reviewing the  
organization's 10-year-old policy on homosexuality, which opposes  
counseling that treats same-sex attraction as a mental illness, but  
does not forbid various therapies that address unwanted same-sex  
attraction.

Focus on the Family has joined more than 250 pro-family organizations  
and individuals in urging the APA to recognize the religious beliefs  
of clients and to allow those who struggle with unwanted same-sex  
attraction to receive therapy. The letter is signed by the Southern  
Baptist Convention, Assemblies of God, Church of the Nazarene, the  
American Association of Christian Counselors, the National Board of  
Christian Clinical Therapists and more than 22 higher-education  
institutions.

[...]

Warren Throckmorton, a psychology professor at Grove City College  
near Pittsburgh, was denied a seat on the task force.

"We work with clients to pursue their chosen values," he told The  
Associated Press. "If they are core, unwavering commitments to their  
religious belief, therapists should not try to persuade them  
differently under the guise of science."

[...]

But Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director of issue analysis for Focus  
on the Family Action, said she believes the APA "is on a path to  
religious discrimination."

"Based on the charge to the task force," she said, "one possible  
outcome is that the APA will declare any therapy that does not affirm  
homosexuality as unethical — regardless of the client's goal. This  
would be a slap in the face to millions of Americans who hold  
religious and moral views on homosexuality."
[More at URL]


----- 31 -----
Abstinence Funding Granted Three-Month Extension
Focus on the Family
7-11-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005028.cfm

The U.S. House today passed legislation that extends funding for  
Title V abstinence education for three months – until the end of the  
fiscal year.

The Senate passed the bill last month. It now goes to the president.

Section 510 of Title V of the Social Security Act – established in  
1996 – allows money for abstinence-only education to be distributed  
to states that apply for it. Bush submitted a budget reauthorization  
proposal in 2002, but Congress failed to act. Title V funding has  
continued under a series of temporary reauthorizations and was set to  
expire on June 30. The three-month extension buys lawmakers little  
time to save the program.

Linda Klepacki, analyst for sexual health at Focus on the Family  
Action, said people must continue to contact their federal lawmakers  
and ask them to support abstinence-until-marriage education funding  
beyond the three-month extension.

[More at URL]


----- 32 -----
Restoring Sexual Identity
Hope for Women Who Struggle with Same-Sex Attraction
Anne Paulk
Focus on the Family
Paperback

http://resources.family.org/product/id/101676.do?code=OL07XFARC3

Are you or someone you know struggling with same-sex attraction? Is  
lesbianism an inherited predisposition? Find answers to this and  
other critical questions. Women, their families and friends wrestling  
with this issue will find practical advice for healing and change.


----- 33 -----
ACLU Challenges Arizona Tuition Tax-Credit Program
Supporters say it's all private money.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
7-11-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000005030.cfm

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is trying to get a court to  
declare Arizona's tuition-credit program unconstitutional because it  
allows tuition scholarships to be used at religious schools.

This is the fifth attempt by the ACLU and its allies to get School  
Choice Arizona declared unconstitutional. The program, which helps  
parents get their kids out of failing schools and creates competition  
in education, is funded by private donors who get a tax credit for  
supporting education.

[More at URL]


----- 34 -----
Coach Dungy Keeps 'First Things First'
Super Bowl winner visits Focus on the Family as new book hits the  
shelves.
by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor
Focus on the Family
7-10-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000005027.cfm

Beginning Wednesday, Focus on the Family founder Dr. James Dobson  
sits down with Tony Dungy, coach of the Super Bowl-champion  
Indianapolis Colts.

"He's a champion in many areas, as I think we'll see," Dr. Dobson  
says at the beginning of Day 1 of the three-day broadcast. "We are  
elated … to have one of the finest men in America in our studio. We  
are so excited about him being with us, not just because he is  
successful as a coach, but because of the character of the man. He is  
deeply committed to Jesus Christ, and he maintains a consistent  
witness in everything that he does."

[More at URL]


----- 35 -----
University Sued for Refusing to Recognize Christian Group
Focus on the Family
7-10-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005022.cfm

The Christian Legal Society and Alliance Defense Fund filed suit in  
federal court today against University of Florida officials on behalf  
of a Christian fraternity, Beta Upsilon Chi (BYX). University  
officials refuse to recognize BYX as a registered student group  
because the group limits its membership to Christian men.

“Christian student groups cannot be singled out for discrimination.  
The right to associate with people of like mind and interest applies  
to all student groups on a public university campus,” Timothy J.  
Tracey, litigation counsel for CLS’s Center for Law & Religious  
Freedom, said in a statement.

[...]

Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action,  
said: "The national pattern of intentional discrimination against  
Christian groups by state universities is a First Amendment disgrace."


----- 36 -----
Brownback Attempts to Restore Decency
Two amendments would help reverse a negative court ruling.
by Ashley Horne, federal issues analyst
Focus on the Family
7-10-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000005026.cfm

Legislation that would restore regulation of sex, profanity and  
violence on broadcast TV is scheduled for a vote Thursday in a U.S.  
Senate subcommittee.

One of the two amendments offered by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.,  
would render moot a recent U.S. circuit court decision that struck  
down government efforts to regulate indecent content during the "safe  
harbor" hours of 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Last month, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FCC  
exceeded its authority by finding so-called "fleeting expletives" to  
be indecent. If left to stand, the 2nd Circuit's decision would allow  
networks to air the "f-word" and "s-word" at any time of day.

The second amendment would give the Federal Communications Commission  
the authority to prohibit excessive violence from 6-10 p.m. on prime- 
time TV.
TAKE ACTION
If your senator is listed below, urge him or her to support Sen.  
Brownback’s two decency amendments when the Senate Financial Services  
Subcommittee marks up the Financial Services Appropriations Bill on  
Thursday. If you are a CitizenLink subscriber, click on the link in  
the e-mail. Otherwise, click on this link.

Democratic subcommittee members:
Sen. Richard Durbin (Chairman, Ill.)
Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.)
Sen. Mary Landrieu (La.)
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.)
Sen. Ben Nelson (Neb.)

Republican subcommittee members:
Sen. Sam Brownback (Ranking member, Kan.)
Sen. Christopher Bond (Mo.)
Sen. Richard Shelby (Ala.)
Sen. Wayne Allard (Colo.)

[More at URL]


----- 37 -----
Washington Briefing: Engaging the Next Generation
Pro-family leaders will equip values voters to speak out.
by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor
Focus on the Family
7-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000005009.cfm

The Washington Briefing 2007: Values Voter Summit, to be held Oct.  
19-21, is designed to help values voters have a voice in issues of  
importance to the family.

Sponsored by FRC Action and co-sponsored by Focus on the Family  
Action, American Values and the Alliance Defense Fund, the second  
annual summit will allow conferees the chance to attend a host of  
events, including speeches, breakout sessions and private luncheons.

Tony Perkins, president of FRC Action, talked with CitizenLink about  
the October conference.

[More at URL]


----- 38 -----
Fewer Americans View Children as Important to Happy Marriages
Most say a two-parent home is best for raising children.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
7-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000005015.cfm

Children were ranked next to last in a list of nine qualities for a  
happy marriage, in a survey from the Pew Research Center Americans.

Even sharing household chores ranked as more important. Only 41  
percent of those polled said children are important to a successful  
marriage, which is down 24 percent since 1990.

Cary Funk, a Pew Research spokesman, said more than six in 10 said  
marriage was for personal happiness and fulfillment.

"So, we’re thinking about marriage in terms of the satisfaction of  
the couple and less as the purpose being to have children,” he told  
Family News in Focus. "People are thinking differently about marriage  
– especially about the role of children in marriage – than they did  
15 or 20 years ago.”

Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director, issue analysis at Focus on the  
Family Action, said the survey is an alarming indicator that our  
culture is too inwardly focused.

[More at URL]


----- 39 -----
Man Claims Bar Exam Question About Homosexual Rights is Unconstitutional
Focus on the Family
7-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005011.cfm

A Massachusetts man has filed a lawsuit claiming a question about  
same-sex "marriage" on the state's bar exam violated his rights, Fox  
News reported.

Stephen Dunne took the bar exam in May; his score was less than two  
points shy of the requirement to pass. Dunne said that's because he  
left one question unanswered concerning the rights of two married  
lesbians, their children and their property.  He said he believed it  
legitimized same-sex "marriage" – which is contrary to his moral and  
religious beliefs.

It's a "disguised mechanism to screen applicants according to their  
political ideology (and) has the discriminatory impact of persecuting  
and oppressing sincere religious practices and beliefs," Dunne said  
in his lawsuit.

The bar exam, he said, is not the place for questions about same-sex  
marriage.

"There's a different forum for that contemporary issue to be  
discussed, and it's inappropriate to be on a professional licensing  
examination," Dunne said. "You don't see questions about partial- 
birth abortion or abortion on there."

[Editor's note: same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, and as  
such, part of Massachusetts law.]


----- 40 -----
Missouri Bans Planned Parenthood from Classrooms
Focus on the Family
7-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005013.cfm

Legislation signed today by Missouri Gov. Matt Blunt means abortion  
providers will not be allowed to present information about sexual  
health in the state's public schools, The Associated Press reported.

The law also requires abortion clinics to become ambulatory surgical  
centers and makes the Missouri Alternatives to Abortion Services  
Program permanent.

"All life is precious and needs to be treated with the utmost dignity  
and respect," Blunt said. "I will continue working with the Missouri  
General Assembly to pass strong pro-life legislation that respects  
the sanctity and dignity of all human life."

[More at URL]


----- 41 -----
Sunflower State to Review Abortion Laws, Make Recommendations
Focus on the Family
7-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000005012.cfm

In the wake of legal controversy surrounding notorious late-term  
abortionist George Tiller, Kansas lawmakers have formed a committee  
that will review abortion laws and make recommendations for next  
year's session, The Associated Press reported.

Six members of the Kansas House and three members of the Senate will  
participate in the review.

Rep. Melvin Neufeld, speaker of the House, said it was the  
investigation into Tiller, initiated by former Attorney General Phill  
Kline and continued, to some extent, by Attorney General Paul  
Morrison that exposed a significant disagreement in the  
interpretation of the law.

[More at URL]


----- 42 -----
Obama: Clueless on Christian compassion
Posted: July 5, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Tom Minnery

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56512

At a recent church conference, Sen. Barack Obama gave a speech  
designed to stir the hearts of all of us who yearn for more authentic  
religion in the public square.

He was earnest, compassionate – and thoroughly misleading about the  
proper roles of religion and government. As the presidential campaign  
progresses, we will hear more such talk, and so what he had to say  
must be dissected carefully.

First of all, the speech was powerful in its call for moral influence  
on government. Had parts of it been delivered by my boss, Dr. James  
Dobson, Barry Lynn would have fired up his sound-bite machine and the  
media would have been apoplectic for days. But Sen. Obama is a  
political liberal, and so there was no controversy.

[More at URL]


More information about the Active-l mailing list