[Active-l] (NEWS) Today's Cultural Warfare Update

Dara (R'ykandar Korra'ti) kahvi at murkworks.net
Sat Mar 10 11:43:54 PST 2007


All kinds of stuff in today's update; key elements include the Faith  
and Freedom Network and Focus on the Family condemning "medically  
correct" data in sex education because science is too lefty; there's  
also a bunch of stuff about the Newt Gingrich interview with James  
Dobson and the continuing attacks on John Edwards as gay (which he's  
not; he's got three kids and has been married for a few decades) and/ 
or "womanly," which - given the picture of Edwards as a Breck Girl in  
an old ad is clearly intended to carry "cross-dresser" baggage. I  
have to winder if a Guilani supporters are involved, given that there  
are actual pictures of Guilani at fundraisers in drag, and hamming it  
up with Donald Trump.

There's also a big upsurge in theocon-called action items. Those are  
always noted by ACTION ITEM. I kind of presume that opposition groups  
call in and do the opposite of the theocon requests.

Anyway, here's today's news.

Hullabaloo gets vaguely culture-war-coverage-ish with James Dobson's  
radio lovefest with former Speaker Newt Gingrich, comparing and  
contrasting Dobson on Clinton and Dobson on Gingrich; I include it  
here because it has extensive quotes from James Dobson, with  
reasonable context;

Here's the Focus on the Family promo for the Dobson-Gingrich interview;

Meanwhile, in Florida, there's a counter-protest in support of the  
city manager fired - against city policy, even - for undergoing  
gender reassignment;

The, how can I put this? Faggotisation? of John Edwards continues,  
this time courtesy Rush Limbaugh, who says he could be "our first  
woman president";

More Dobson-on-Clinton, this via a nicely cached Google retrieval;

"Mormonism — That’s So Gay";

Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM against Colorado house bill to allow  
gay people to adopt;

Focus on the Family complains that science programmes aren't giving  
doctorates to creationist students trying to study creationism as an  
"alternative to evolution," spins it as _religious oppression_ -  
"This issue of peer review and peer pressure -- it's real. Political  
correctness reigns on the campus, and Christianity is definitely not  
politically correct." No, the problem is that creationism isn't  
_factually_ correct;

Focus on the Family story about how _men_ are hurt by not being able  
to control whether a woman gets an abortion;

Citizen Magazine article promoting the New Life Church and lauding  
its hard-line stance against GBLT people, particularly after the Ted  
Haggard scandal;

Focus on the Family condemns evangelical groups pushing for action on  
global warming;

FotF condemns New Mexico legislation allowing stem-cell research on  
leftover embryos intended to be discarded after fertility treatments;

Mississippi abortion ban - comprehensive except for rape or life of  
the mother, no health exemption - to be signed into law by Gov. Haley  
Barbour; it's a "trigger law" that won't take effect unless Roe v.  
Wade is overturned;

Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM against California assisted-suicide law;

FotF "Illinois Professor Refuses to Issue Grade to Christian Student"  
- after she implied legal action against him for downgrading a grade  
on a "faith-based" paper about therapy for "post-abortion syndrome,"  
which is something the theocons made up;

Connecticut considering bill mandating "MySpace age checks" before  
people can post profiles, thus eliminating 90% of the MySpace  
audience base;

New Hampshire repeals "pro-life parential notification law"; Focus on  
the Family is unhappy about it;

FotF unhappy that Wisconsin has turned down abstinence-education  
funds from the Feds;

FotF ACTION ITEM against Washington State bill (SB 5297) considering  
a bill stopping abstinence-only - abstinence can still be taught, but  
can't be the only thing taught, and it also requires information be  
medically accurate; theocons locally are _pissed off_;

FotF writing about their state-level "Family Policy Councils" which  
create "judicial voter guides"; we've seen these here, but Washington  
State isn't specifically listed;

FotF ACTION ITEM against "subversion of marriage" bills in Maine and  
New Mexico; the Maine bill would "bar clergymen from signing marriage  
licenses"; the New Mexico bills in question are domestic partnership  
bills;

Faith and Freedom Network condemns "medically correct" sex-education  
bill in Washington State, issues ACTION ITEM against; also condemn  
scientific peer review because, and I am quoting as always, "the  
journals are controlled by far left secularist organizations that do  
not allow the abstinence people to publish";

Faith and Freedom Network condemns the Enlightenment (by  
implication), as part of an attempt to describe the American Founding  
Fathers as confirmed fundamentalist evangelicals. Note that modern  
fundamentalism wasn't even invented until the late 19th and early  
20th century, over 100 years later;

Faith and Freedom Network condemns domestic partnership benefits  
vote, and is "reviewing the viable options of response," which I  
suspect means, "figuring out whether to sue";

Focus on the Family drools over the prospect of a John Paul Stevens  
retirement or death, talks about the need for Chief Executive Bush to  
nominate a social conservative to overturn Roe v. Wade;

FotF unhappy at Iowa passing a stem-cell research bill, calling it a  
"cloning bill";

New York Catholic Conference condemns stem-cell research funding bill  
in New York State;

FotF condemns Washington State domestic partnership bill, calls for  
state initiative to ban DP benefits;

FotF condemns Georgia law for not specifically refusing to recognise  
adoptions by same-sex partners; reports on a court case where a  
woman's custody rights were upheld by a Georgia court involving a  
lesbian couple who had split up;

James Dobson op-ed in the Rocky Mountain News condemning same-sex  
parents, defending his quoting of researchers who say that he is  
specifically and misrepresenting their research; his response  
continues to be, 'am not';

Focus on the Family unhappy with New Hampshire bills recognising  
domestic partnerships;

Focus on the Family happy with advancement of "Ky. Fetal-Pain Bill."


----- 1 -----
The Screaming Minority
Friday, March 09, 2007
Hullabaloo
by digby

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/03/screaming-minority-by-digby-i- 
hope-that.html

I hope that nobody gets the idea that Newt Gingrich's comments to  
James Dobson exposing him as a rank hypocrite are going to mean  
anything to the Christian Right. They have proven that they are  
remarkably flexible when it comes to the personal morality of  
Republican leaders. If they repent for what they've done, they are  
forgiven, no harm no foul. (See most recently, Mark Foley.)

When it comes to Democrats, you have a very, very different story.

Here's Dobson in September of 1999:

As with many Christians around the country, Shirley and I have been  
in prayer for our leaders in government who must deal with the  
fallout from this scandal. They will need great wisdom and  
discernment in the days ahead. Our most serious concern, however, is  
not with those in Washington; it is with the American people. What  
has alarmed me throughout this episode has been the willingness of my  
fellow citizens to rationalize the President’s behavior even after  
they suspected, and later knew, that he was lying. Because the  
economy is strong, millions of people have said infidelity in the  
Oval Office is just a private affair--something between himself and  
Hillary. We heard it time and again during those months: “As long as  
Mr. Clinton is doing a good job, it’s nobody’s business what he does  
with his personal life.”

That disregard for morality is profoundly disturbing to me. Although  
sexual affairs have occurred often in high places, the public has  
never approved of such misconduct. But today, the rules by which  
behavior is governed appear to have been rewritten specifically for  
Mr. Clinton.

[More at URL]


----- 2 -----
Gingrich Tells Dobson He's 'Sought God's Forgiveness'
Focus on the Family
March 7, 2007

[Received in email - no URL]

Former U.S. Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich told Dr. James C.  
Dobson he has “gotten on (his) knees and sought God’s forgiveness”  
for his moral failings.

In a two-part installment of Dr. Dobson’s international radio program  
airing Thursday and Friday, Gingrich also discusses his new book,  
Rediscovering God in America, and the rising threat of radical Islam  
to the West.

On day two of the program, Dr. Dobson compares the attitudes of  
today’s Muslim radicals to the actions of the Nazis in the 1930s -- a  
hatred of Jews and a desire for hegemony and domination.

“It bothers me,” he says, “that many of our leaders don’t seem to get  
that – Republicans and Democrats.”

Gingrich agrees, noting that “there are 15- to 25-year-old men who  
are willing to die as long as they kill you.”

“It’s a warrior culture,” he adds. “That has been true historically  
for 6,000 or 7,000 years.”

[ http://listen.family.org/daily/A000000371.cfm ]

[More at URL]


----- 3 -----
350 rally to protest city manager's ouster
The Largo official, fired last week over plans for a sex change, says  
the support is overwhelming.
By EILEEN SCHULTE
Published March 7, 2007

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/03/07/Tampabay/350_rally_to_protest_.shtml

LARGO - They stood 350 strong in the grass outside City Hall on  
Tuesday morning, united by faith.

They held signs, saying "Justice," "Compassion" and "Love," as well  
as these:

Some Baptists need their hearts examined.

Jesus wasn't the Terminator.'

[...]

They were there to support Steve Stanton, who was fired from his job  
as city manager by the City Commission after disclosing that he is  
going to undergo gender-reassignment surgery.

The 30-minute rally drew more than a dozen clerics from churches and  
synagogues around the Tampa Bay area.

[More at URL]


----- 4 -----
New Winger Attack: John Edwards Could Be Our "First Woman President"
By Eric Kleefeld
Election Central

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/09/ 
new_winger_attack_john_edwards_could_be_our_first_woman_president

It looks as if Ann Coulter's "faggot" insult of John Edwards has set  
the tone for a new right-wing taunt: That John Edwards could become  
our "First Woman President." Check out this screen grab of Rush  
Limbaugh pushing the new smear:

[...]

RUSH: try this headline. Ann Coulter, if you're out there listening,  
listen to this headline from the _New York Sun_ today: "Could John  
Edwards Become the First Woman President?" It's by John Gerstein in  
the New York Sun...

[...]

Rush's diatribe above was inspired by an article yesterday in the  
conservative New York Sun entitled, "Could Edwards Become First Woman  
President?." The artice quoted abortion rights activist and Edwards  
backer Kate Michelman saying that Edwards "understands the reality of  
women's lives." The Sun then suggested that her praise for Edwards on  
women's issues is "provoking debate" that Edwards may soon lay claim  
to the title of "First Woman President," and to attack Michelman and  
the Edwards campaign for pushing such an argument. The kicker:  
Neither Michelman nor the Edwards camp were ever quoted actually  
making any such point.

Nevertheless, Rush picked up on the article and said:

	So John Edwards is on tap now, according to one of the nation's
	largest abortion rights supporters to become the first woman
	president in the United States — and, of course, the barrier is
	down. The first black president, Bill Clinton. That barrier is
	broken. Sometimes all you can do is laugh at these people.
	Speaking of the Breck Girl...

[More at URL]


----- 5 -----
Dr. Dobson's Study
Focus on the Family
September 1998

http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:prxi9BC9YEkJ:wings.buffalo.edu/ 
philosophy/faculty/smith/clinton/character.html+James+dobson+clinton 
+impeachment&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

Dear Friends:

Greetings to you all. Shirley and I have been visiting the historic  
city of Boston for the past few weeks while working on a new book  
called Coming Home. I’ll tell you more about that at Christmastime.  
We have loved being together and are particularly grateful to God for  
His healing touch after my illness. Toward the end of our trip,  
however, we were shocked and dismayed by the admission of the  
President’s affair with “that woman — Miss Lewinsky” — which brought  
humiliation on himself, his family and our nation. Millions of words  
have been written and spoken about that sordid story, which I have  
chosen not to address during these past seven months. But now I want  
to express some passionate views that are on my heart.

As with many Christians around the country, Shirley and I have been  
in prayer for our leaders in government who must deal with the  
fallout from this scandal. They will need great wisdom and  
discernment in the days ahead. Our most serious concern, however, is  
not with those in Washington; it is with the American people. What  
has alarmed me throughout this episode has been the willingness of my  
fellow citizens to rationalize the President’s behavior even after  
they suspected, and later knew, that he was lying. Because the  
economy is strong, millions of people have said infidelity in the  
Oval Office is just a private affair--something between himself and  
Hillary. We heard it time and again during those months: “As long as  
Mr. Clinton is doing a good job, it’s nobody’s business what he does  
with his personal life.”

That disregard for morality is profoundly disturbing to me. Although  
sexual affairs have occurred often in high places, the public has  
never approved of such misconduct. But today, the rules by which  
behavior is governed appear to have been rewritten specifically for  
Mr. Clinton. We now know that this 50-year-old man had sexual  
relations repeatedly and brazenly in the White House, with a woman 27  
years his junior. Then he spoke on national television while shaking  
his finger at the camera, and denied ever having a sexual  
relationship with Miss Lewinsky. He was the most powerful man in the  
world and she was a starry-eyed intern. That situation would not have  
been tolerated in any other setting — ever. And yet the apologists  
for the President have said endlessly, “It’s just about sex,” as  
though cheating on your wife was of no particular significance. But  
the majority of the American people replied, “I support the President.”

[More at URL]


----- 6 -----
Mormonism — That’s So Gay
Posted by Garance under Uncategorized
March 3, 2007

http://thegarance.com/archives/174
Ann Coulter’s vile decision to call John Edwards a “faggot” after  
being praised by G.O.P. presidential candidate Mitt Romney actually  
seemed pretty sophisticated intra-conservative politics to me, since,  
according to a reporter for a conservative publication, the new joke  
making the rounds at the Conservative Political Action Conference was:

“Mormonism — that’s so gay!”

Aggressive heterosexuality is Romney’s defense against his years  
leading gay-friendly Massachusetts, and also against the taint of  
sexual non-conformity his Mormon religion still carries. Polygamy and  
homosexuality have been so routinely condemned in tandem by  
conservatives over the past decade that the two now seem forever  
combined in their thinking. Recall Rick Santorum’s contention that:

“if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex  
within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the  
right to polygamy”

[More at URL]


----- 7 -----
Colorado Legislature Considers Gay Adoption
Family advocates gear up for a fight.
by Pete Winn, associate editor
3-7-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000004079.cfm

Liberal Colorado lawmakers unveiled a bill Tuesday that would allow  
homosexual couples to adopt children.

House Bill 1330, sponsored by House Majority Leader Alice Madden, D- 
Boulder, would also include cohabiting couples and relatives of unwed  
mothers.

"It's about parental responsibility and protecting our kids and  
providing them with the most economically stable homes they can  
have," she told the Rocky Mountain News.

But Jim Pfaff, president of Colorado Family Action, said the  
legislation exploits single parents in order to promote homosexual  
adoption.

"All the high-minded discussion of 'protecting children' and  
'parental responsibility' is merely a smokescreen for the true intent  
of this legislation: paving the way for homosexual adoption," he said.

[...]

Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director of issue analysis for Focus on  
the Family Action, said implementing gay adoption in Colorado would  
advance a broader political agenda to mainstream and normalize  
homosexual behavior.

"If we are truly concerned about the needs of children, we should not  
consider policies that increase the likelihood that children will  
grow up without a mother or father," she said.

[...]

TAKE ACTION
Coloradans should contact their state lawmakers and ask them to  
oppose HB 1330.

If you are a CitizenLink Daily Update subscriber, click on the blue  
"Take Action" button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to  
our Action Center. You can find contact information there. Otherwise,  
click on this link.

[More at URL]


----- 8 -----
Christian Scholars Face Opposition When Studying Origins
University faculties take a dim view of alternatives to evolution.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
3-7-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004080.cfm

Christian students seeking to study human origins are facing  
discrimination at many colleges and universities. Experts say  
Darwin's Theory of Evolution has such a lock on faculty members, few  
Christians who take a different point of view are getting through  
advanced degree programs.

Last year, Bryan Leonard, an Ohio State University graduate student,  
was preparing to defend his doctoral dissertation on the merits of  
teaching alternatives to evolution. But his dissertation was pulled.  
University officials determined he was subjecting students in his  
research to something harmful.

[...]

John Morris, president of the Institute for Creation Research, said  
Leonard's experience is not an anomaly.

"There's a closed system there," he told Family News in Focus. "This  
issue of peer review and peer pressure -- it's real. Political  
correctness reigns on the campus, and Christianity is definitely not  
politically correct."

[More at URL]


----- 9 -----
College Men Psychologically Affected by Abortion
Many call it the worst day.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
3-7-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004081.cfm

A UCLA psychiatrist has noted that many college-aged men she's  
counseled appear to have been impacted by abortion.

Dr. Miriam Grossman noticed a significant number of young men  
reported a sleeping disorder. She began asking whether they had  
participated in an abortion. Most said "Yes."

"I had a young man a few weeks ago who was very surprised that I was  
asking him," she said. "But, he did say, 'Yeah, about a month ago my  
girlfriend had an abortion. It was a whole big story, and he was  
pretty upset about it."

[More at URL]


----- 10 -----
Principle Trumps Personality
by Tom Minnery
Focus on the Family

http://www.citizenlink.org/citizenMag/A000003986.cfm

A few miles up the road from our Focus headquarters in Colorado  
Springs is a huge church whose broad blue dome dominates the  
landscape. This is New Life Church , with 14,000 members, and every  
one of them has been stunned by the sudden loss of their beloved  
pastor, the church founder, Ted Haggard.

Ted was dismissed by the church overseers, and placed in a program of  
restoration, following a revelation by a homosexual prostitute that  
he and Ted had been having a sexual relationship.

The prostitute revealed all this on a Denver radio talk show a week  
before Election Day, and the story electrified the front pages of the  
state's newspapers for days. It was a shock to churchgoers and non- 
churchgoers alike.

[...]

I've thought a lot about that and here is my conclusion. The pastor  
may have been a hypocrite, but the church was not. The revelation  
against him was made on a Wednesday, the board of overseers  
investigated on Thursday and Friday, and were dissatisfied with the  
pastor's answers. He was dismissed on Saturday and the congregation  
was told on Sunday. The following Tuesday was the election.

[...]

In this age of infinite tolerance, when elite society tolerates  
everyone's “lifestyle” and wishes only to “celebrate diversity,” this  
rock-solid stand for morality made a deep impression on the public, I  
believe, and not often do people see this. From President Clinton's  
evasions about Monica, all the way back to the Watergate era, when  
President Nixon's spokesman could suddenly declare certain statements  
“no longer operative,” we have grown accustomed to the bob and the  
weave, to the guiltless admission and the non-fat confession.

[More at URL]


----- 11 -----
Dr. Dobson, Evangelical Leaders
Challenge Global-Warming Rhetoric
Letter urges National Association of Evangelicals to restrain its D.C  
spokesman.
Received March 2, 2007

[Received in email; no URL]
In a letter to the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), James  
C. Dobson, Ph.D., chairman of Focus on the Family Action, joined  
other pro-family leaders in urging the NAE to refrain from taking a  
position on the controversial and divisive topic of global warming  
and other issues.

NAE official Richard Cizik, who works in the group’s Washington,  
D.C., office, has told the media it’s indisputable that human  
activity has contributed to global warming and has encouraged  
evangelicals to make it a top issue. On other occasions, he's said  
evangelicals “must confront population control.”

“We ask,” Dobson and the others wrote, “how is population control  
going to be achieved, if not by promoting abortion, the distribution  
of condoms to the young and even by infanticide in China and  
elsewhere? Is this where Richard Cizik would lead us?”

To demonstrate that not all evangelicals are on board with global- 
warming alarmism, the letter references a statement by the Interfaith  
Stewardship Alliance that challenges common assumptions about global  
warming.

[More at URL]


----- 12 -----
N.M. Advances Embryonic Stem-Cell Legislation
Focus on the Family
3-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004101.cfm

The New Mexico Senate narrowly passed a bill Thursday to allow  
research on human embryos, KOB-TV reported.

The bill now heads to the House.

"These are embryos that are either going to be frozen or discarded,"  
said Republican Sen. John Ryan. "Doctors tell me that this research  
can occur on those embryos."

[More at URL]


----- 13 -----
Pro-Life Trigger Law Heads to Mississippi Governor
Focus on the Family
3-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004102.cfm

Lawmakers in the Magnolia State sent the governor pro-life  
legislation on Thursday that includes an abortion trigger law, an  
ultrasound provision and a parental-involvement clause, The  
Associated Press reported.

Under the bill, abortion would become illegal if the 1973 Supreme  
Court decision Roe v. Wade is overturned. It provides an exception  
for rape or if the life of the mother is at risk.

[More at URL]


----- 14 -----
Oregon's Assisted-Suicide Law Draws Attention
With California and Vermont in a race to legalize assisted suicide,  
all eyes are focused on the only state where it's already legal.
by Pete Winn, associate editor
Focus on the Family
3-9-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000004106.cfm

Oregon published statistics Thursday for the ninth time since voters  
there approved physician-assisted suicide.

In 2006, physicians prescribed death for 46 people, according to the  
Oregon Department of Public Health. The numbers are rising.

All told, 292 have killed themselves with the help of doctors since  
the law took effect in 1998. Nearly 400 others obtained lethal drugs  
but did not use them -- if you believe the statistics.

But Wesley Smith, who opposes euthanasia, warned that the statistics  
can't be trusted because they depend on self-reporting by doctors.

"We really don’t know what the numbers are," he added. "They even say  
that the accuracy of their report depends on the accuracy of the  
information they receive. And there is no way to investigate if  
something wrong is taking place."

[...]

"They now use the term 'aid-in-dying.' They call physician-assisted  
suicide, 'physician aid in dying' or PAD -- so physicians now 'induce  
PAD,' " he said.
"It is playing word games with what is really going on to allow a  
physician to help kill a patient and pretend that is not what's going  
on."

Dr. Charles Bentz, president of the Physicians for Compassionate Care  
Foundation, said pro-death advocates threatened the Department of  
Human Services with litigation if the state continued to use the word  
"suicide."

The name change is actually part of the pro-death movement's two-part  
agenda.

[...]

TAKE ACTION
If you live in California, please contact your lawmakers and ask them  
to oppose the assisted-suicide bill. To find out who your lawmakers  
are -- and for talking points on the legislation -- please see the  
California Family Council Web site.

[More at URL]


----- 15 ------
Illinois Professor Refuses to Issue Grade to Christian Student
Focus on the Family
3-8-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004097.cfm

Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) intervened after a  
professor at Southern Illinois University refused to grade the paper  
of a Christian student.

Christine Mize, a social work graduate student, had to create an  
eight-week therapy program based on a topic of her choice.

She chose to create a therapy model for women who suffer from post- 
abortion syndrome and told her professor, Laura Drueth Zeman, that  
the recovery portion would be faith-based.  Drueth Zeman told Mize  
that she would downgrade the paper if it included a faith-based element.

Mize handed in her paper without the contested section, but also  
provided the professor with legal information to avoid any such  
misunderstandings in the future.

Amy Smith, litigation counsel for ADF, said Drueth Zeman has had the  
paper since December and has refused to issue a grade -- leaving  
Mize, a 4.0 student, with an incomplete in a class required for  
graduation.

[More at URL]


----- 16 -----
Connecticut Wants Mandatory MySpace Age Check
Focus on the Family
3-8-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004098.cfm

A bill proposed by Connecticut lawmakers and backed by the state  
attorney general would require social-networking sites including  
MySpace.com to obtain parental consent before minors can post  
profiles, The Associated Press reported.

MySpace.com currently relies on the user to specify an age. Under the  
proposal, such sites would be required to verify that age and obtain  
parental permission for minors.

[More at URL]


----- 17 -----
New Hampshire Representatives Vote Against Parents' Rights
Focus on the Family
3-8-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004100.cfm

The New Hampshire House voted Wednesday to repeal a pro-life parental- 
notification law that's been tied up in a legal challenge since it  
passed in 2003, LifeNews.com reported.

Abortion advocates filed suit, because the law does not include an  
exception to let teens get a judicial waiver. That would allow them  
to skip telling their parents before getting an abortion.

Rep. Fran Wendelboe introduced an amendment that would have fixed that.

[More at URL]


----- 18 -----
Wisconsin Rejects Abstinence Funds
Governor prefers comprehensive sex ed.
from staff reports
Focus on the Family
3-8-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004094.cfm

Wisconsin's governor has turned down $600,000 for abstinence education.

Gov. Jim Doyle objected to the federal requirement that the money  
only be used to teach the benefits of abstinence until marriage.  
Stephanie Marquis, Doyle's spokeswoman, said the governor wants to  
also teach kids about condoms.

"With our state (and) other states turning down the money," she said,  
"we’re hoping that it also sends a very clear message that we want to  
also be talking about how to prevent adolescent pregnancy.”

Wisconsin joins four other states that have rejected abstinence  
funds: California, Pennsylvania, Maine and New Jersey.

[More at URL]


----- 18 -----
State Abstinence Programs Under Attack
Washington state Senate votes for Planned Parenthood pleasing  
curriculum.
by Pete Winn, associate editor
Focus on the Family
03-08-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000004096.cfm

Lawmakers in several states have launched an offensive to eliminate  
abstinence-only education. That campaign has advanced furthest in  
Washington.

The state Senate there passed a bill on Wednesday, 30-19, that will  
mandate all public schools teach Planned Parenthood-endorsed sex-ed  
curriculum that's used in Seattle schools.

"We're just sick about it," Sen. Val Stevens told CitizenLink. "It's  
probably the worst piece of legislation that we've passed in the 15  
years I've been in the Legislature."

The measure would specifically ban local districts from teaching the  
value of purity.
"The bill will eliminate the opportunity for the schools to teach  
abstinence education, unless they also present the 'medically  
correct' -- as it is being called -- curriculum that will be  
developed by the state superintendent of public instruction," said  
Stevens, a Republican from Arlington.

[...]

Benn said a federally mandated curriculum would likely mandate  
discussion of birth control and homosexuality.

TAKE ACTION
If you live in the state of Washington, please contact your  
representative and insist that he or she vote against Senate Bill 5297.

For help in contacting your lawmakers, please visit the CitizenLink  
Action Center.


----- 19 -----
Putting Judges to a Vote
Citizen Magazine
Focus on the Family
by Bruce Hausknecht, J.D.

http://citizenlink.org/citizenMag/A000003995.cfm

Public accountability is on the rise among state judges who never had  
reason before to care what voters thought of their philosophy.

Voters in certain states cast their ballots last November with  
greater confidence than ever before, especially in their assessment  
of judges seeking office.

Those citizens had the benefit of judicial voter guides created and  
distributed by family policy councils (FPCs)—state-level allies of  
Focus on the Family Action, a non-profit, non-tax-deductible cultural  
action organization chaired by Dr. James C. Dobson.

The FPCs first sent questionnaires to each of the candidates, and  
then published the results in hard copy form or on a Web site. The  
level of success varied by state, depending on the newness of the  
voter guide effort and the type of judicial elections involved,  
according to several FPC leaders interviewed by Citizen . Although  
more voter education on the importance of state judges may be needed,  
overall voter awareness and demand for such information appears to be  
gaining momentum.

[More at URL]


----- 20 -----
Two States Consider Subversion of Marriage
Bills in Maine and New Mexico would bar clergy from signing marriage  
licenses and remove mention of brides and grooms.
by Pete Winn, associate editor
Focus on the Family
3-5-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000004063.cfm

The Maine Legislature is considering a bill that would bar clergymen  
from signing marriage licenses. And lawmakers in New Mexico will soon  
vote on domestic partnerships in the Land of Enchantment.

Michael Heath, executive director of the Christian Civic League of  
Maine, told CitizenLink only a justice of the peace, a lawyer, a  
judge or a notary public would be able to sign marriage licenses, but  
not clergymen.

"I think it's an insane, absurd bill," Heath said. "I can't even  
believe we're wasting time talking about it. It's stupid."

Still Heath said Mainers need to contact legislators about the bill,  
which hasn't yet passed the committee level, just in case.

In New Mexico, meanwhile, lawmakers are poised to pass much more  
sinister legislation that would change the state's marriage laws in  
preparation for legalizing domestic partnerships.

Mona Passignano, state issues analyst for Focus on the Family Action,  
said SB 1003 would amend marriage licenses in New Mexico.

"It would remove the words 'bride' and 'groom,' from the marriage  
license; instead it would say 'Applicant 1' for the bride and  
'Applicant 2’ for the groom," Passignano said. "Later on, the word  
'male' is replaced by 'Applicant 1' and the word 'female' is replaced  
by 'Applicant 2.' "

The bill would also strip out any mention of "the holy bonds of  
matrimony" in the current law -- and replace it with "marriage."

New Mexico State Rep. Nora Espinoza, R-Roswell, said there is only  
one reason why the changes are being sought.

"This is [domestic partnerships]," Espinoza said. "We've got to fight  
-- for our kids, for the future generation. What Christians do not  
understand is, give me one generation of your children, and I will  
show you the future of your nation."

In fact, Passignano said there are three domestic-partnership bills  
moving fast through the New Mexico Legislature.

HB 603 would give domestic partners the same rights as spouses – in  
child custody, divorce, and property disputes.

HB 15 would require insurance carriers to offer health benefits to  
domestic partners if an employer asks for them.

The third, SB 502, would change retiree health care to include  
domestic partners.

State Sen. Mark Boitano, R-Albuquerque, opposes making domestic  
partnerships legal. He said its proponents are making a full-court  
press in the Senate, since there are only 12 days left this session.

Boitano said he was pressured by lobbyists to approve domestic  
partnership just prior to speaking with CitizenLink.

"The case that they are making is that things are changing," he said.  
"It's absolutely true. The world today is much different than the  
world 50 years ago or 100 years ago. But there are certain things  
that don't change -- the order in the universe doesn't change . . .  
and the science of social structures doesn't. The family is the basis  
and the foundation of our society and it is just not appropriate to  
compare domestic partners to married couples."

Passignano, meanwhile, said gay activists have been forthright in  
saying that pushing for domestic partnerships is just a stepping  
stone for gay marriage.

"And they are setting the stage for domestic partnerships in the  
state of New Mexico," she said. "The scary thing is New Mexico is one  
the few states that doesn't even have a DOMA law, a defense of  
marriage act, on the books. So this state is very, very vulnerable on  
this issue."

TAKE ACTION:
If you reside in Maine or New Mexico, log into the CitizenLink Action  
Center to contact your lawmakers. In New Mexico, ask lawmakers to  
oppose SB 1003, HB 603, HB 15 and SB 502. In Maine, ask lawmakers to  
oppose the bill banning clergy from marriage licenses.

If you don't yet have a CitizenLink account, you can create one  
easily here.


----- 21 -----
"Big Brother Olympia On Steriods"
Faith and Freedom Network
Friday, March 09, 2007

http://www.faithandfreedom.us/weblog/2007/03/big-brother-olympia-on- 
steriods.html

Senator Tim Sheldon (D) told me this morning that the Senate passage  
of Sex-Ed Bill SB 5297 this week was, “big brother Olympia on  
steroids.” As you can imagine, a good number of Republicans agreed,  
but in the end, there were not enough Senators who care about the kids.

Senator Val Stevens (R) told me this morning that, “If this bill  
becomes law, I would recommend that parents carefully reconsider  
allowing their child to be influenced by a system that is sending a  
double message.”

Senate Bill 5297 eliminates the opportunity for schools to teach  
abstinence education, unless they present the “medically correct”  
curriculum that will be developed by the state superintendent of  
public instruction. The “medically correct” sex-ed will be Planned  
Parenthood endorsed curriculum like that used in the Seattle schools.

[...]

Here’s how it works. In order to be medically and scientifically  
accurate, it must be verified and supported (in its research) by peer  
review. Abstinence education can not get into peer review journals  
because the journals are controlled by far left secularist  
organizations that do not allow the abstinence people to publish.  
Thus eliminating abstinence-only education.

[...]

SB 5297 will now go before the House of Representatives for  
consideration.

This is a time when we must speak.

Please call and write your State Representatives and ask them to vote  
against SB 5297. Click here for contact information regarding  
Washington State Representatives. Legislative Hotline: 1.800.562.6000.

Also, be sure to vote on our new poll. I have been told that many  
legislators pay attention to the Faith & Freedom poll numbers. Click  
here to go to the poll.

[More at URL]


----- 22 -----
Faith and the Founders
Faith and Freedom Network
Wednesday, March 07, 2007

http://www.faithandfreedom.us/weblog/2007/03/faith-and-founders.html

Whether you are reading some of the posts on this website or simply  
listening to conversation on a college campus, it doesn't take long  
before you hear the "free thinkers," secular humanists or atheists  
begin their mantra about how "secular" and deist our Founders were in  
their beliefs. Or worse yet, sometimes we hear that our Founders were  
actually followers of the French Enlightenment Movement.

This, of course, is standard fare in too many high school and college  
classrooms. And when people who have been educated to believe this  
are confronted with the Founders actual quotes and speeches, they  
attack the messenger.

[More at URL]


----- 23 -----
Washington Lawmakers move toward gay marriage
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Faith and Freedom Network

http://www.faithandfreedom.us/weblog/2007/03/washington-lawmakers- 
move-toward-gay.html

Today Washington State Senate passed a measure by a 28 to 19 vote  
that will allow Domestic Partnerships.

Voting was as follows: 3/1/2007
Voting Yea: Senators Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Eide, Fairley,  
Franklin, Fraser, Haugen, Hobbs, Jacobsen, Kastama, Kauffman, Keiser,  
Kilmer, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Marr, McAuliffe, Murray, Oemig, Poulsen,  
Prentice, Pridemore, Regala, Rockefeller, Spanel, Tom, and Weinstein .

Voting Nay: Senators Benton, Carrell, Clements, Delvin, Hargrove,  
Hatfield, Hewitt, Holmquist, Honeyford, McCaslin, Morton, Parlette,  
Rasmussen, Roach, Schoesler, Sheldon, Stevens, Swecker, and Zarelli  
Absent: Excused: Senators Pflug and Shin

The following is the text from a press release sent out by Faith &  
Freedom today.

________________

Gary Randall, President of Faith & Freedom said, “By passing the  
domestic partnership bill today, the Washington Legislature has  
chosen a path toward gay marriage.”

Senator Ed Murray, Rep. Jim Moeller, and other sponsors of the bill  
have made it clear to both the press and the public that the ultimate  
prize is “marriage equality” – or gay marriage.

Randall said, “I think a number of legislators who are not  
comfortable with voting for gay marriage chose this vote as an  
alternative. Unfortunately, rather than a helpful compromise, this  
decision will most likely prove to be an enabling step toward same- 
sex marriage, as we are seeing in New Jersey.” Randall also said, “As  
this plays out over the next year or so, some lawmakers may find  
themselves at odds with their constitutes, in that a majority of  
Washington citizens do not favor gay marriage.”

Jon Russell, Senior Field Director and lobbyist said, “I think the  
bill is inherently discriminatory because it extends benefits to  
homosexuals and elderly unmarried couples living together while  
excluding many other classes of relationships.”

Faith & Freedom is reviewing the viable options of response.


----- 24 -----
Showdown Ahead
Can social conservatives emerge victorious while liberal Democrats  
remain in control of the U.S. Senate?
by John Paulton
Citizen Magazine
Focus on the Family Action
March 2007

http://citizenlink.org/citizenMag/A000003993.cfm

All political eyes are on John Paul Stevens these days. For months,  
the 86-year-old Supreme Court Justice has been the subject of  
speculation. First, there were rumors of ill health. Then came  
surprising reports that the Court's longest-serving liberal wants to  
resign his seat while a Republican holds the White House, out of a  
sense of loyalty to the man who nominated him—the late President  
Gerald Ford. Current speculation is that a Stevens resignation could  
come this summer, after the Court has concluded its current term.

Even if a Stevens vacancy does not happen this year, the odds are  
that the next Supreme Court opening will result from a liberal  
vacating his or her seat. The average age of the four conservative  
jurists is 59, while the average age of the remaining justices is 73.  
Should one of the liberal seats open up while President Bush is still  
in office, the political battle for the ages would begin. After all,  
if one of the liberal justices were to be replaced with one who  
recognizes a constitutional duty to interpret rather than create the  
law, there is a strong chance that the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision  
could be overturned, sending control over abortion back to the states.

That reality has the Left apoplectic. As the Roberts and Alito  
confirmation battles revealed, most liberals view abortion as the one  
right that must be protected above all others—and that means holding  
on to the courts at all cost.

But many other critical matters are at stake as well. The definition  
of marriage, religious freedom, school choice, property rights and  
national security are among the many issues in which activist, left- 
leaning courts have held sway. While adding a fifth conservative to  
the Court wouldn't change things overnight, the eventual impact could  
be breathtaking. It's no wonder that the battle lines are drawn.

[More at URL]


----- 25 -----
Iowa Gov. Signs Cloning Bill
Focus on the Family
3-2-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004045.cfm

A bill that will allow scientists to clone human embryonic life then  
kill it in the name of science was signed by Iowa Gov. Chet Culver on  
Thursday, LifeNews.com reported.

The bill repeals a prior ban on such destructive research.

Culver said the repeal paves the way in the "search for lifesaving  
cures for diseases."

[More at URL]


----- 26 -----
N.Y. Governor Wants State-Funded Destructive Embryonic Stem-Cell  
Research
Focus on the Family
3-2-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004048.cfm

New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer has proposed legislation that would  
designate hundreds of millions in state funds for research on human  
embryos, LifeNews.com reported.

Richard Barnes, director of the New York Catholic Conference,  
testified before Senate and House committees considering the bill.

"The governor's stem-cell research proposal," he said, "is devoid of  
any moral consideration whatsoever for the living human embryos who  
will be subject to experimentation and destruction."

[More at URL]


----- 27 -----
Domestic Partnerships Looming in Washington State
Focus on the Family
3-2-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004049.cfm

The Washington State Senate approved a bill Thursday that would grant  
same-sex couples the right to enter domestic partnerships. The  
legislation is expected to easily pass in the House, The Seattle  
Times reported.

The bill would extend most of the benefits of marriage to gay and  
lesbian couples, though gay-advocacy groups say it is just a step  
toward the ultimate goal.

"We'll keep coming back and keep telling the story and hope people  
go, 'Geez, let's just get it over with -- let's pass marriage," said  
Democratic Sen. Ed Murray.

Republican Sen. Val Stevens is opposed to the legislation.

[...]

Sonja Swiatkiewicz, director of issue response for Focus on the  
Family Action, said Stevens is right.

"Though Washington has a Defense of Marriage statute, it's clear that  
marriage will remain vulnerable in the Evergreen State until the  
people have the chance to preserve traditional marriage at the ballot  
box."

[More at URL]


----- 28 -----
Ga. Court Refuses Gay Adoption Challenge
Ex-partner of same-sex couple will keep parental standing.
Focus on the Family
from staff reports
3-2-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004050.cfm

Georgia's State Supreme Court will not hear an appeal to a decision  
granting child-custody rights to a lesbian's former partner.

The case involves a woman allowed to adopt her same-sex partner's  
biological child. When the relationship dissolved two years later, a  
custody battle ensued.  Georgia state law did not provide answers, so  
a lower court allowed the adoption to stand.

Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action,  
said gay-advocacy groups are celebrating the state's lack of clarity  
surrounding the issue.
"They got their foot in the door with the original adoption decree,"  
he said, "and they figure that once they get that foot in the door  
it’s easy to keep marching forward."

[More at URL]


----- 29 -----
Children Need Both a Mother and a Father
Dr. Dobson won't back down on what's best for children, no matter how  
noisily gay activists complain.
by James C. Dobson, Ph.D.
Focus on the Family
3-2-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000004052.cfm

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following op-ed by James C. Dobson, Ph.D.,  
chairman and founder of Focus on the Family, first appeared in the  
Rocky Mountain News on Feb. 28.

In December of last year, I received a request from Time magazine  
asking me to address the issue of Mary Cheney's decision to have a  
baby with her lesbian partner, Heather Poe. I complied, and my  
commentary was published in the magazine's Dec. 18 issue.

Although the statement was entirely respectful to Cheney and Poe, I  
did express my strong opinion that children need both a mother and a  
father, and that the preponderance of behavioral research supports  
that belief. From that point forward, I have been subjected to a  
barrage of criticism and insults from homosexual activists, including  
two lesbian protesters who came to the door of our organization last  
week demanding a retraction. The Rocky Mountain News reported their  
unexpected visit, but to its credit, has now given me an opportunity  
to reply.

[More at URL]


----- 30 -----
New Hampshire Considers Civil Unions
Focus on the Family
3-1-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004033.cfm

The New Hampshire Legislature will consider two bills that would give  
same-sex couples the rights of marriage, the Nashua Telegraph reported.

HB 431 would create civil unions for same-sex couples, giving them  
the rights and privileges of marriage. HB 235 would mandate the state  
to recognize out-of-state gay marriage.

[More at URL]


----- 31 -----
Ky. Fetal-Pain Bill Advances
Focus on the Family
3-1-2007

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLBriefs/A000004034.cfm

The Kentucky Senate Judiciary Committee approved legislation  
Wednesday that would require abortionists to tell women that a  
preborn child may feel pain during an abortion, The Associated Press  
reported.

[More at URL]




More information about the Active-l mailing list